To begin this journey of reviewing EPals.com, I introduced my own intrigue for collaborative learning. While I have yet to find an article about the use of EPals.com in libraries that is not produced by EPals themselves, I find an article that discussed collaborative learning strategies in libraries, but it was approached in a most unusual way…
Article: Sinclair, Bryan. (2007). Commons 2.0: Library Spaces Designed for Collaborative Learning. EDUCAUSE Quarterly (EQ), 30(4): 4-6.
Article synopsis: Sinclair examines the physical space of libraries in relation to the effects of Web 2.0 technology as seen on social and educational levels. Collaboration is emphasized today in so many more facets of life, and this article argues that because of this, the spaces around people in collaboration with one another should reflect this new flavor of learning. The author terms these new-and-improved spaces as the Commons 2.0. Commons 2.0’s would feature the latest technology, connectivity and comfort in order to encourage creativity and working as a group on projects.
The “Resource Review” verdict: Looking at this suggestion in regards to the digital tool I am reviewing, it is evident that EPals.com makes global connections between users, not just focusing on collaboration but – more importantly – collaboration using digital tools. Aside from some shortcomings (e.g. attempts to enhance global perspective without really addressing the issue of the Digital Divide), EPals.com has demonstrated its ability to bring people together in educational endeavors. So I think for classrooms or libraries working on these projects both globally and locally, a physical space that enhances the learning environment such as a Commons 2.0 would be beneficial for promoting teamwork and get the creative juices flowing. However, I don’t think a Commons 2.0 space would really have as huge an effect on EPals.com users to the extent that this article argues that Commons 2.0 spaces will reap. While spatial factors play a role in influencing learning environments, they are kind of the frosting on the cake. If the program or resource that is used by a person, class or group of people lacks educational quality to start, no amount of trendy furniture, lattes or other Commons 2.0 elements will necessarily make collaboration any more active or original.
So in closing...: I am very interested in hearing more about what librarians think about the upgrade to a Commons 2.0 to the physical spaces of their libraries, and if there is any debate that goes alone with the issue and its close ties with digital tools. In my research for another class, I found there is a growing trend, especially in academic libraries, to create Commons 2.0 spaces, also known as InfoCommons. As we continually adopt new technologies in libraries, I think a central concern should be how to encourage collaborative learning in these environments using the digital tools (especially the free ones like EPals.com!). A Commons 2.0 may look cool and be really comfortable to lounge and work in, but any decision to renovate should be – in my opinion – a supplement to a philosophy of collaboration and education already alive and well in the library space.
